Replacing people is the expensive option
Recruitment fees, months of ramp-up, and lost client knowledge all land before a new hire is productive. Keeping someone good is almost always cheaper than replacing them.

Independent employee listening · Europe
Loyal employees are hard to find. Let us help you keep yours — and make them happier.
CanarySpill runs protected, anonymous employee surveys inside your company, analyses the results independently, and shows you exactly what to fix before your best people start looking elsewhere.
Employees answer with a shared company code. Nobody in your company ever sees who said what.
We interpret the patterns and tensions and tell you what to do — not just averages to stare at.
Results are suppressed below the agreed cohort threshold and comments are screened for identity clues.
Why now
Our view, from running listening programmes for European employers.
Recruitment fees, months of ramp-up, and lost client knowledge all land before a new hire is productive. Keeping someone good is almost always cheaper than replacing them.
People rarely announce that they have checked out. It shows up first in effort, candour, and discretionary work — long before a resignation letter.
By the time someone is leaving, they have already decided and they are rarely fully honest. Anonymous listening tells you while there is still something to fix.
The engagement
CanarySpill sits between employees and leadership as an independent listening partner.
We define the questions, privacy threshold, audience, and reporting scope with your leadership team.
Employees answer with a shared company access code. Identity is separated from answers and never shown to employers.
We test themes across leadership, culture, reward, wellbeing, inclusion, and psychological safety.
Your team receives a clear evidence pack, facilitated readout, and prioritised retention actions.
What you receive
Every engagement closes with a consultancy-led readout that makes the trade-offs visible and the next steps specific.
Download the full services & analysis overview (PDF)Illustrative example · fictional data
Every engagement produces the same depth of evidence: scores by theme and question, where cohorts diverge, whether pay holds up, what needs attention first, how you're trending against your own history, how you compare to our wider portfolio, and what people actually write when nobody can trace it back to them.
Overall assessment
3.4 / 5
Participation
78%
Protected cohort
64
Employee eNPS
+12
Priority attention
Auto-surfaced from the scores — where to focus first, not left for you to spot in a table.
Critical
Wellbeing & workload
Averaging 2.5 / 5 across 4 questions — well below a healthy range.
Critical
Tenure 2–5 years
-0.7 vs. company average (n=19) — meaningfully less positive than the rest.
Priority
Reward & fairness
Averaging 2.9 / 5 — worth addressing before it becomes a retention risk.
Average score across the six grouped assessment themes.
Favourable (4–5), neutral (3), and unfavourable (1–2) share of responses.
Favourable Neutral Unfavourable
Difference from the company average for each privacy-safe group.
Groups below the agreed privacy threshold are never reported.
If we've run more than one programme with you, here's whether things are moving.
3.1 / 5
2024
3.4 / 5
+0.3
2025
3.8 / 5
+0.4
2026
Each theme against what we typically see across our portfolio.
Culture & collaboration
Portfolio avg 3.9
Reward & fairness
Portfolio avg 3.3
Wellbeing & workload
Portfolio avg 3.1
Psychological safety
Portfolio avg 3.4
Median pay by cohort, with year-on-year movement.
Company median
€52,000
Year movement
+2.1%
Most frequent language across protected free-text answers.
Comments are screened for identity clues before anything reaches leadership.
A human reading of the numbers, not an automated summary.
Collaboration is a genuine strength and new joiners are positive. The retention risk sits with employees at 2–5 years: recognition, workload, and pay clarity all drop together in that group, which is exactly where replacing someone costs you the most.
Example priority action
Rebalance workload in Operations and publish a transparent progression and pay framework within 90 days.
Outcomes
Each part of the report is tied to something you can change this quarter.
Cohort gaps show which tenure groups, departments, and manager lines are drifting, so you intervene with the people most likely to go.
Wellbeing and capacity scores, plus what people write in their own words, tell you where the pressure is genuinely unsustainable.
Median pay by cohort and pay-clarity scores show whether your reward story holds up in the eyes of the people living it.
Psychological safety and recognition results give each leader something specific to change, not a company-wide average to ignore.
Start a conversation
Register your interest and choose how you would like to meet. We will confirm the scope, privacy model, audience, and timing with you — then help you keep the people you cannot afford to lose.